Comparison of Protein Ratio and Ash Amounts of Propolises Colleced From Different Regions in Bingöl

Authors

  • Ömer DÖNER Bingöl Üniversitesi, Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Arı Arı Ürünleri Ana Bilim Dalı
  • Hakan İNCİ Bingöl Üniversitesi, Ziraat Fakültesi, Zootekni Bölümü

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.46291/ISPECJASvol5iss2pp372-380

Keywords:

Propolis,, ash ratios,, protein ratios,, chemical content,

Abstract

In this study, ash ratios and protein ratios of propolis samples collected from different apiaries identified in Genç, Karlıova and Solhan districts of Bingöl province, which has an important place in the beekeeping sector, were examined. At the end of the experiment, the protein ratios of the propolis samples were found to be between 2.18-4.73%, and ash rates varying between 1.76-4.29%. The findings of standardization of propolis, especially forming and Turkey Bingöl also be said to contribute to studies related to the determination of the chemical composition of propolis.

References

Aliyazicioglu, R., Şahin, H., Ertürk, O., Ulusoy, E., Kolaylı, S. 2013. Properties of phenolic composition and biological activity of propolis from Turkey. International Journal of Food Properties, 16: 277-287.

Anonim, 2016a. Bingöl Belediyesi Resmi İnternet Sayfası. http:// www.bingol.bel.tr/ (Erişim Tarihi: 01.02.2016).

Bankova, V. 2005. Chemical diversity of propolis and the problem of standardization. Journal of E thnopharmacology, 100(1-2): 114-117.

Bankova, V., Popova, M., Trusheva, B. 2016. New emerging fields of application of propolis. Macedonian Journal of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, 35(1): 1-11.

Bankova, V., Marcucci, M.C. 2000. Standardization of propolis: Present Bee World, 81: 182-188 .

Borba, R.S., Klyczek, K.K., Mogen, K.L., Spivak, M. 2015. Seasonal benefits of a natural propolis envelope to honey bee immunity and colony health. Journal of Experimental Biology, 218: 127-324.

Burdock, G.A. 1998. Review of the biological properties and toxicity of bee propolis. Food and Chemical Toxicology, 36 (4): 347-363.

Castaldo, S., Capasso, F. 2002. Propolis, an old remedy used in modern medicine. Fitoterapia, 73: 1-6.

Crane, E.E. 2013. The world history of beekeeping and honey hunting. Routledge Taylor and Francis Group, New York: 483-551.

Cunha, B., Ildenize, B.S. 2004. J. Braz. Chem. Soc. 15(6): 964.

Coşkun, P., İnci, H. 2020. Antibacterial, antiviral, antioxidant activity and chemical content of propolis. ISPEC Tarım Bilimleri Dergisi, 4 (4): 1053-1070.

Ghisalberti, E.L. 1979. Propolis: A Review. Bee World, 60: 59–84.

Giada, M.D.L.R. 2013. Food phenolic compounds: main classes, sources and their antioxidant power. In: Oxidative Stress and Chronic Degenerative Diseases: A role for antioxidants. Chapter: 4. (ed: José A. Moralez-González). Intech Publisher. 87-112.

Graikou, K., Popova, M., Gortzi, O., Bankova, V., Chinou, I. 2016. Characterization and biological evaluation of selected Mediterranean propolis samples. Is it a new type? LWT-Food Science and Technology, 65: 261-267

Keskin, Ş., Yatanaslan, L., Karlıdağ, S. 2020. Anadolu’nun farklı illerinden toplanan propolis örneklerinin kimyasal karakterizasyonu. Uludağ Arı Dergisi, 20 (1): 81-88.

Kumova, U., Korkmaz, A., Avcı, B.C., Ceyran, G. 2002. Propolis: An important bee product. Uludag Bee Journal, 2: 10-24.

Popova, M., Popova, V., Bankova, D., Butovska, V., Petkov, B., Nikolova-Damyanova, A.G., Sabatini, G.L., Marcazzan, S., Bogdanov-Validated. 2004. Methods for quantification of biologically active constituents of “poplar type” propolis. Phytochemical Analysis, 15: 235-240.

Popova, M., Silici, S., Kaftanoglu, O., Bankova, V. 2005. Antibacterial activity of Turkish própolis and its qualitative and quantitative chemical composition. Phytomedicine, 12: 221-228.

Sforcin, J.M., Bankova, V. 2011. Propolis: is there a potential for the development of new drugs? Journal of Ethnopharmacology, 133: 253-260.

Silici, S. 2003. Propolisin bazı antimikrobiyel ve farmakolojik aktiviteleri üzerine bir araştırma. Çukurova Üniversitesi, Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Zootekni Anabilim dalı, Adana.

Silici, S., Kutluca, S. 2005. Chemical composition and antibacterial activity of propolis collected by three different races of honeybees in the same region. J. Ethnopharmacol, 99 (1): 69-73.

Silici, S., Uluozlu, O.D., Tuzen, M., Soylak, M. 2008. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 156: 612-618.

Simoes-Ambrosıo, L., Gregorio, L., Sousa, J., Figueiredo-Rinhel, A., Azzolini, A., Bastos, J., Lucısano-Valım, Y. 2010. The role of seasonality on the inhibitory effect of Brazilian green propolis on the oxidative metabolism of neutrophils. Fitoterapia, 81: 1102-1108.

Şahinler, N., Kaftanoglu, O. 2005. Natural product propolis: chemical composition. Nat. Prod. Res., 19 (2): 183-18.

Teixera, E.W., Negri, G., Renata, M., Message, D., Salatino, A. 2005. Plant origin of gren propolis bee behavior, plant anatomy and chemistry. Oxford University Journal, 2 (1): 85-92.

Published

2021-06-02

How to Cite

Ömer DÖNER, & Hakan İNCİ. (2021). Comparison of Protein Ratio and Ash Amounts of Propolises Colleced From Different Regions in Bingöl. ISPEC Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 5(2), 372-380. https://doi.org/10.46291/ISPECJASvol5iss2pp372-380

Issue

Section

Articles