2
Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam Üniversitesi, Ziraat Fakültesi, Tarla Bitkileri Bölümü, Kahramanmaraş
3
Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam Üniversitesi, Ziraat Fakültesi, Tarla Bitkileri Bölümü, Kahramanmaraş
4
Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam Üniversitesi, Ziraat Fakültesi, Tarla Bitkileri Bölümü, Kahramanmaraş
5
Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam Üniversitesi, Ziraat Fakültesi, Tarla Bitkileri Bölümü, Kahramanmaraş
6
Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam Üniversitesi, Ziraat Fakültesi, Tarla Bitkileri Bölümü, Kahramanmaraş
Abstract
Cultivation of one or more non-similar plants together in the same order or in different orders is called “intercropping”. The study was conducted to study the impact of different cultivation patterns (sole maize (%100 mazie), sole mung bean (100 % mung bean), 1M + 1MFS (50 % maize + 50 % mung bean), 1M + 1MFA (100 % maize + 100 % mung bean), 2M + 1MFA (100 % maize + 50 % mung bean), 3M + 1MFA (100 % maize + 33 % mung bean) and 3M + 1MFS (75 % maize + 25 % mung bean) on the yield and silage quality of maize+mung beans on the same row in Kahramanmaraş ecological conditions. The trial randomized blocks were carried out in three repetitions according to the trial pattern. Total forage yield 315.48-7429.46 kg da-1, silage dry matter (T60) ratio 24.27-31.45 %, silage pH 3.81-4.86, lactic acid bacterial count 4.54-5.74 (log10 cfu g silage-1), yeast count 3.80-6.31 (log10 cfu g silage-1). Protein content of varied from 6.09 to 14.55 %, NDF content from 43.62 to 50.44 %, and ADF contents from 26.06 to 30.91 %. The research resulted in an increase in quality raw forage production, combined with the production system. As a result of the findings obtained, 3M+1MFA planting system is recommended for high forage yield and a quality silage in the second product conditions.
AKBAY, F., GÜNAYDIN, T., KIZILYAR, E. N. ., ARIKAN, S., KORKMAZ, Z., & KIZILŞİMŞEK, M. (2024). The Impact of Different Planting Systems in Maize-Mung Bean Production on the Silage Quality and Fermentation in Second Product Conditions. ISPEC Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 8(4), 992–1000. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13734061
📄Aizaz, M., Khan, I., Lubna, Asaf, S., Bilal, S., Jan, R., AL-Harrasi, A., 2023. Enhanced physiological and biochemical performance of mung bean and maize under saline and heavy metal stress through application of endophytic fungal strain SL3 and exogenous IAA. Cells, 12(15): 1960.
📄Akbay, F., Günaydın, T., Arıkan, S., Kızılsımsek, M., 2023. Performance of new lactic acid bacteria strains as ınoculants on the microorganism composition during fermentation of alfalfa silage containing different dry matter content. Black Sea Journal of Agriculture, 6(4): 402-410.
📄AOAC, 1990. Official Methods of Analysis. 15th Edition, Association of Official Analytical Chemist, Washington DC.
📄Arıkan, S., Akbay, F., Korkmaz, Z., Günaydın, T., Kızılyar, E.N., Kızılşimşek, M., 2023. Yem bezelyesinin farklı oranlarda arpa ve buğday ile birlikte yetiştirilmesinin silaj kalitesine etkisi. ISPEC Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 7(3): 461-471.
📄Azim., A., Khan, A.G., Nadeem, M.A., Muhammad, D., 2000. Influence of maize and cowpea ıntercropping on fodder production and characteristics of silage. Asian Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences, 13(6): 781-784.
📄Erdoğdu, İ., Altinok, S., Genç, A., 2013. The effect of different seeding rates of intercropped corn an soybean on some plant characteristics and forage yield. Biyoloji Bilimleri Araștırma Dergisi, 6(1): 6-10.
📄Ertekin, I., Yılmaz, Ş., 2022a. The effects of sowing designs on forage yield and quality of sweet sorghum and mung bean mixtures under mediterranean conditions. Turkish Journal of Field Crops, 27(2): 188-199.
📄Ertekin, İ., Yılmaz, Ş., 2022b. Variation of epiphytic flora affecting silage quality in pure and mixed mung bean and sweet sorghum. Black Sea Journal of Agriculture, 19-20.
📄Ghotbi, V., Mahrokh, A., Tehrani, A.M., Asadi, H., 2022. Evaluation of forage yield and quality of cowpea, guar, and mung bean under drought stress conditions. Chemistry Proceedings, 10(1): 62.
📄Gürel, N., Okant, M., 2020. Mısır (Zea mays L.) ve börülce (Vigna sinensis L.)’nin ikinci ürün olarak birlikte yetiştirilmesinin yeşil ot verimi ve bazı yapısal karakterlere etkilerinin bir arada bulunduğu bir üründür. ISPEC Tarım Bilimleri Dergisi, 4(1): 31-41.
📄Kalaycı, Ş., 2006. SPSS Uygulamalı Çok Değişkenli İstatistik Teknikleri. Ankara: Asil Yayın Dağıtım.
📄Khan, M.A., Naveed, K., Ali, K., Bashir, A., Samin, J., 2012. Impact of mungbean-maize intercropping on growth and yield of mungbean. Pakistan Journal of Weed Science Research, 18(2): 191-200.
📄Kızılşimşek, M., Erol, A., Dönmez, R., Katrancı, B., 2016. Silaj mikro florasının birbirleri ile ilişkileri, silaj fermentasyonu ve kalitesi üzerine etkileri. Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam Üniversitesi Doğa Bilimleri Dergisi, 19(2): 136-140.
📄Kızılşimşek, M., Günaydın, T., Aslan, A., Keklik, K., Açıkgöz, H., 2020. Improving silage feed quality of maize intercropped with some legumes. Türk Tarım ve Doğa Bilimleri Dergisi, 7(1): 165-169.
📄Kızılşimşek, M., Ozturk, C., Yanar, K., Ertekin, I., Ozkan, C.O., Kamalak, A., 2017. Associative effects of ensiling soybean and corn plant as mixtures on the nutritive value, fermentation and methane emission. Fresenius Environmental Bulletin, 26(10): 5754-5760.
📄Kurt, D., Aydemir, S.K., 2023. Silajlık mısır ve baklagil bitkilerinin ot kalitesi açısından birlikte yetiştirilme olanaklarının belirlenmesi. Kadirli Uygulamalı Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 3(2): 271-284.
📄Mohan Naik, G., Abhirami, P., Venkatachalapathy, N., 2020. Mung bean. Pulses: Processing and Product Development, 213-228.
📄Moon, N.J., 1981. Effect of inoculation of vegetable processing wastes with Lactobacillus plantarum on silage fermentation. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 32(7): 675-683.
📄Mousavi, S.R., Eskandari, H., 2011. A general overview on intercropping and its advantages in sustainable agriculture. Journal of Applied Environmental and Biological Sciences, 1(11): 482-486.
📄Öten, M., Kiremitçi, S., Çınar, O., 2016. Determination of silage quality of some forage crops and mixtures by different methods. Anadolu dergisi, 26(2): 33-43.
📄Seale, D.R., Pahlow, G., Spoelstra, S.F., Lindgren, S., Dellaglio, F., Lowe, J.F., 1990. Methods for the microbiological analysis of silage. In: “Grass and Forage Reports” (Ed. S. Lindgren and K.L. Pettersson), Proceedings of the Eurobac Conference. Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, pages 147-164.
📄Sencar, Ö., Gökmen, S., Yıldırım, A., Kandemir, N., 1997. Tarla Bitkileri Üretimi. Gaziosmanpaşa Üniversitesi, Ziraat Fakültesi Yayın No:3, Tokat, s 302.
📄Seydoşoğlu, S., Gelir, G., 2019. Farklı oranlarda karıştırılan mürdümük (Lathrus sativus L.) ve arpa (Hordeum vulgare L.) hâsıllarının silaj özellikleri üzerinde bir araştırma. Iğdır Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi, 9(1): 397-406.
📄Shaker-Koohi, S., Nasrollahzadeh, S., Raei, Y., 2014. Evaluation of chlorophyll value, protein content and yield of sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L.) / mungbean (Vigna radiate L.) intercropping. International Journal of Biosciences, 4(8): 136-143.
📄Soe Htet, M.N., Hai, J.B., Bo, P.T., Gong, X.W., Liu, C.J., Dang, K., Feng, B.L., 2021. Evaluation of nutritive values through comparison of forage yield and silage quality of mono-cropped and intercropped maize-soybean harvested at two maturity stages. Agriculture, 11(5): 452.
📄Van Soest, P.J., Robertson J.D., Lewis. B.A., 1991. Methods for dietary fibre, neutral detergent fibre and non-starch polysaccharides in relation to animal Nutrition. Journal of Dairy Science, 74: 3583-3597.
,
Tuğba GÜNAYDIN
2