Hay Yield and Quality of Rye with Hungarian Vetch and Forage Pea in Intercropping


Abstract views: 181 / PDF downloads: 104

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8066271

Keywords:

Legumes, rye, intercropping, hay quality

Abstract

The aim of the study is to determine the forage yield and quality of Hungarian vetch/forage pea (MF/YB) and rye (C) in an intercropping system that provides maximum faulting from the field. The field experiment was conducted in 2021-2022 to examine the effects of different binary sowing ratio (20:80%C/YB, 40:60%C/YB, 60:40%C/YB; 80:20%C/YB; 20:80%C/MF, 40:60%C/MF, 60:40%C/MF; 80:20%:C/MF, 100%MF, 100%YB, 100%C) in 3 replications. Trial was harvested in July 2022 and green herbage yield, hay yield, crude protein ratio, crude protein yield, ADF, NDF and mineral substance contents were determined. All of the investigated parameters were affected by the mixing ratios. With the decrease of rye ratio in the mixture, green herbage and hay yields decreased, but crude protein ratio increased. In terms of all three yield values, treatments with the highest ratio of rye in the mixture came to the fore. While the ADF and NDF contents increased in parallel with the rye ratio in the mixture, the mineral substance contents decreased in general. As a result, the evaluation of rye in intercropping system with MF and YB in the region and similar ecologies was complementary in terms of yield and quality. According to the parameters examined, mixtures of 80:20%C/YB and 80:20%C/MF were found to be superior to the others.

References

Afshar, I., Haghighi, A.R., Shirazi, M., 2014. Comparison the effects of spraying different amounts of nano zinc oxide and zinc oxide on, wheat. International Journal of Plant, Animal and Environmental Sciences, 4(3): 688.

Ahemad, M., Zaidi, A., Saghir Khan, M., Oves, M., 2009. Biological importance of phosphorus and phosphate solubilizing microbes - an overview. In: M.S. Khan, A. Zaidi (Eds), Phosphate Solubilising Microbes for Crop Improvement, Nova Science Publishers, Newyork, USA, pp. 1-14.

Arnoud, M.J., 2008. Update on the assessment of magnesium status. British Journal of Nutrition, 99(3): 24-36.

Banik, P., Midya, A., Sarkar, B.K., Ghose, S.S., 2006. Wheat and chickpea intercropping systems in an additive series experiment: Advantages and weed smothering. European Journal of Agronomy, 24: 325-332.

Basaran, U., Dogrusoz, M.C., Gulumser, E., Mut, H., 2017. Hay yield and quality of intercropped sorghum-sudan grass hybrid and legumes with different seed ratio. Turkish Journal of Field Crops, 22(1): 47-53.

Chapagain, T., Riseman, A., 2014. Barley-pea intercropping: Effects on land productivity, carbon and nitrogen transformations. Field Crops Research, 166: 18-25.

Dumlu Gul, Z., Tan, M., 2013. Using Legume forage crops for silage. Journal of Agricultural Faculty of Atatürk University, 44(1): 189-193.

Ferraretto, L.F., Fonseca, A.C., Sniffen, C.J., Formigoni, A., Shaver, R.D., 2015. Effect of corn silage hybrids differing in starch and neutral detergent fiber digestibility on lactation performance and total-tract nutrient digestibility by dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science, 98: 395-405.

Galanopoulou, K., Lithourgidis, A.S., Dordas, C.A., 2019. Intercropping of faba bean with barley at various spatial arrangements affects dry matter and N yield, nitrogen nutrition index, and interspecific competition. Notulae Botanicae Horti Agrobotanici Cluj-Napoca, 47: 1116-1127.

Gülümser, E., Mut, H., Başaran, U., Doğrusöz, M.Ç., 2021. Yem bezelyesi ile yulafın farklı oranlarda karıştırılması ile elde edilen silajların kalite özelliklerinin belirlenmesi. Journal of the Institute of Science and Technology, 11(1): 763-770.

Gülümser, E., Mut, H., Doğrusöz, M.Ç., Başaran, U., 2017. Baklagil yem bitkisi tahıl karışımların ot kalitesi üzerinde tohum oranlarının etkisi. Selcuk Journal of Agriculture and Food Sciences, 31(3): 43-51.

Javanmard, A., Nasiri, Y., Shekari, F., 2014. Competition and dry matter yield in intercrops of barley and legume for forage. Albanian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 13: 22-32.

Jensen, E.S., 1996. Grain yield, symbiotic N2 fixation and interspecific competition for inorganic N in pea-barley intercrops. Plant and Soil, 182: 25-38.

Johansen, A., Jensen, E.S., 1996. Transfer of N and P from intact or decomposing root of pea to barley interconnected by an arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 28: 73-81.

Kidambi, S.P., Matches, A.G., Karnezos, T.P., Keeling, J.W., 1993. Mineral concentrations in forage sorghum grown under two harvest management systems, Agronomy Journal, 85: 826-833.

Kökten, K., Tansı, V., 2004. Çukurova koşullarında mürdümük (Lathyrus sativus L.) ile değişik tahıl türleri karışım oranlarının verim ve kaliteye etkisi. Çukurova Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi, 19(4): 69-76.

Kung, LJr., Shaver, R.D., Grant, R.J., Schmidt, R.J., 2018. Silage review: Interpretation of chemical, microbial, and organoleptic components of silages. Journal of Dairy Science, 101: 4020-4033.

Lithourgidis, A.S., Dhima, K.V., Vasilakoglou, L.B., Dordasc, C.A., Yiakoulaki, M.D., 2007. Sustainable production of barley and wheat by intercropping common vetch, Agronomy for Sustainable Development, 27: 95-99.

Lithourgidis, A.S., Dordas, C.A., 2010. Forage yield, growth rate and nitrogen uptake of wheat, barley and rye-faba bean intercrops in three seeding ratios. Crop Science, 50(5): 2148-2158.

Lithourgidis, A.S., Dordas, C.A., Damalas, C.A., Vlachostergios, D.N., 2011. Annual intercrops: An alternative pathway for sustainable agriculture. Australian Journal of Crop Science, 5: 396-410.

Martin, G., Moraine, M., Ryschawy, J., Magne, M.A., Asai, M., Sarthou, J.P., Duru, M., Therond, O., 2016. Crop-livestock integration beyond the farm level: A review of prospects and issues. Agronomy for Sustainable Development, 36-53.

Melesse, A., Steingass, H., Schollenberger, M., Holstein, J., Rodehutscord, M., 2017. Nutrient compositions and in vitro methane production profiles of leaves and whole pods of twelve tropical multipurpose tree species cultivated in Ethiopia. Agroforestry Systems, 93: 135-147.

Minson, D., 2012. Forage in Ruminant Nutrition (Vol. 1). Academic Press, New York.

Neres, M.A., Castagnara, D.D., Silva, F.B., Oliveira, P.S.R., Mesquita, E.E., Bernardi, T.C., Vogt, A.S.L., 2012. Características produtivas, estruturais e bromatológicas dos capins Tifton 85 e Piatã e do feijão-guandu cv. Super N, em cultivo singular ou em associação. Ciência Rural, 42(5): 862-869.

NRC, 2001. Nutrient requirements of dairy cattle. National Academy of Sciences.

Pariz, C.M., Andreotti, M., Tarsitano, M.A.A., Bergamaschine, A.F., Buzetti, S., Chioderoli, C.A., 2009. Desempenhos técnicos e econômicos da consorciação de milho com forrageiras dos gêneros Panicum e Brachiaria em sistema de integração lavoura-pecuária. Pesquisa Agropecuaria Tropical, 39: 360-370.

Ramírez-Restrepo, C.A., Vera-Infanzón, R.R., Rao, I.M., 2020. Predicting methane emissions, animal-environmental metrics and carbon footprint from Brahman (Bos indicus) breeding herd systems based on long-term research on grazing of neotropical savanna and Brachiaria decumbens pastures. Agricultural Systems, 184: 102892.

Roberts, C.A., Moore, K.J., Johnson, K.D., 1989. Forage quality and yield of wheat vetch at different stages of maturity and vetch seeding rate. Agronomy Journal, 81: 57-60.

Seydoşoğlu, S., 2020. Farklı karışım oranları ve biçim dönemlerinin yem bezelyesi ile arpa karışımlarının ot verim performansına etkileri. Iğdır Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi, 10(3): 2136-2142.

Seydoşoğlu, S., Bengisu, G., 2019. Effects of different mixture ratios and harvest periods on grass quality of triticale (xTriticosecale W.)-Forage pea (Pisum sativum L.) intercrop. Applied Ecology and Environmental Research, 17(6): 13263-13271.

Sipahioğlu, O., Mut, H., Gülümser, E., Doğrusöz, M.Ç., Başaran, U., 2022. Yem bezelyesi tarımında arpanın arkadaş bitki olarak kullanılması. ISPEC Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 6(2): 202-210.

Soussana, J.F., Lemaire, G., 2014. Coupling carbon and nitrogen cycles for environmentally sustainable intensification of grasslands and crop-livestock systems. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 190: 9-17.

Tekeli, A., Ates, S., 2005. Yield potential and mineral composition of white clover (Trifolium repens L.) - tall fescue (Festuca arundinacea Schreb.) mixtures. Journal of Central European Agriculture, 6: 27-34.

Tharangani, H., Lu, C., Zhao, L., Ma, L., Guo, X., Weiss, W.P., Bu, D., 2020. Estimation of between-cow variability in nutrient digestion of lactating dairy cows fed corn-based diets. Animals, 10(8): 1363.

Trailokya, A., Srivastava, A., Bhole, M., Zalte, N., 2017. Calcium and calcium salts. Journal of the Association of Physicians of India, 100-102.

Unkovich, M., Baldock, J., Peoples, M., 2010. Prospects and problems of simple linear models for estimating symbiotic N2 fixation by crop and pasture legumes. Plant and Soil, 329: 75-89.

Vasilakoglou, I., Dhima, K., Lithourgidis, A., Eleftherohorinos, I., 2008. Competitive ability of winter cereal-common vetch intercrops against sterile oat. Experimental Agriculture, 44: 509-520.

Yogeshpriya, S., Selvara, P., 2018. Mastery of potassium status and their consequences of hypokalemia in dairy cattle. Shanlax International Journal of Veterinary Science, 5(3): 1-5.

Published

2023-06-21

How to Cite

ÇOPUR DOĞRUSÖZ, M., HAKKOYMAZ, O., BAŞARAN, U., MUT, H., & GÜLÜMSER, E. . (2023). Hay Yield and Quality of Rye with Hungarian Vetch and Forage Pea in Intercropping. ISPEC Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 7(2), 442–450. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8066271

Issue

Section

Articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>